About us Tour IRPEC Products Statistics Directory

Other Information - Fenders
 

Market Information

Marine fenders are an integral part of most large multi-use docks and piers. A well-designed fender system, tailored to specific vessel requirements, will protect a berthing facility and vessels for many years with minimal upkeep and/or future modification. The dock fender system selected to protect a dock structure will affect both the safety and economics of that structure for the rest of structure’s life, even after the fender system is replaced. The job of the fenders is to actually limit the forces applied to dock structures during berthing.

Source: Internet

Malaysia’s Export of Fenders

Year/
Value (RM)
Total
HS Code
4016.94.000
4016.99.700
 

1996 846,508 13,833 14,679
1997 1,104,733 - 1,104,733
1998 2,514,766 31,500 2,546,266
1999 849,507 41,528 891,035
2000 66,301 142,235 208,536
2001 403,005 130,803 533,808
2002 894,302 383,030 1,277,332

Note:
4016.94.000 – Boat or dock fenders whether or not inflatable
4016.99.700 – Deck fenders


Malaysian Customs Duties Order

HS Code
Unit Of Qty
Import
Export
Sales Tax
IL/EL
Asean Cept
Asean Pta

4016.94.000
kg
5%
nil
10%
IL/EL*
5%
-
4016.99.700
kg
5%
nil
5%
5%
-

*Required imports and exports permit, issued by Director General of Environmental Quality, Malaysia

Local Manufacturer

MSL Rubber Industries Sdn Bhd – Shah Alam, Selangor
Kossan Rubber Industries Berhad – Klang, Selangor
Pyrope Industries Sdn Bhd – Klang, Selangor


Sales & Marketing


Pricing

The prices are determined by the size of fenders and customers’ specifications.

Distribution Channels

Fenders are most commonly supplied to ports by contractors, who are asked to provide fenders as part of a competitive bid for an entire package of pier construction or refurbishment. The owner will almost always receive the fender system that was offered at the lowest price. Contractors feel considerable competitive pressure to provide the lowest-price fenders that, they are told, meet owners’ specifications. Because too little is known about what makes an optimum fender system, owners feel a lot of pressure to allow after-the-bid variations from specification, in order not to increase contractors’ costs “for no reason”.

Source: Internet

Competition

In the implementation of AFTA, fierce competition is expected. Currently, there are strong competitions from Singapore, Japan, Australia and in the domestic market. One biggest fenders producer also claimed that China would pose tougher competition soon. For international markets, the major markets for dock fenders are shown in tables below:

Imports of Fenders in Major Markets

JAPAN

(in RM million)
HS Code
1999
2000
2001

401 694 000
3.366
3.698
3.476
Total Imports
3.366
3.698
3.476
       

Japan: Leading Suppliers, % Share

 
% share
 
HS Code
Country
1999
2000
2001

4016.94.000
1 Korea, South
60.68
35.35
32.7200
 
2 China
5.94
28.24
25.53
 
3 UK
0
0
18.61
 
4 US
25.95
20.91
11.84
 
5 Singapore
3.99
3.30
7.77
  0 Malaysia
0
0
0
         

NETHERLANDS

(in RM million)
 
HS Code
1999
2000
2001

4016.94.000
6.654
2.904
2.921
Total Imports
6.654
2.904
2.921
       

Netherlands: Leading Suppliers, % Share


 
% share
 
HS Code
Country
1999
2000
2001

4016.94.000
1 Singapore
40.25
38.07
60.94
  2 Slovenia
13.08
20.31
17.38
  3 Germany
4.30
6.56
6.13
  4 Not Known, In Intra stat
6.33
4.68
5.10
  5 Korea, South
9.88
5.61
4.78
  22 Malaysia
0.96
1.66
0.00

UNITED STATES

(in RM million)
HS Code
1999
2000
2001

4016.94.000
4.164
4.839
3.823
Total Imports
4.164
4.839
3.823

 
United States: Leading Suppliers, % Share

 
% share
 
HS Code
Country
1999
2000
2001

4016.94.000
1 China
9.00
29.12
28.78
  2 Japan
34.55
32.48
23.42
  3 Mexico
20.83
13.00
12.86
  4 Australia
5.69
6.72
12.09
  5 Canada
12.10
8.12
8.11
  0 Malaysia
0.00
0.00
0.00

 
Prospects

The use of local fenders in local ports is still minimal. This is so as local ports authorities have no knowledge of the existence of local manufacturers and their whereabouts. Another cause for this situation is lack of promotions on manufacturers’ part to promote their fenders to ports. Another reason why local ports are reluctant to use local fenders is because of poor presentation approach. No endorsement from the third party such as MRB or SIRIM also contributes to the unappealing local fenders.

The lack of interest to utilize local fenders had prompted MRB and MREPC to help promoting local fenders to Malaysian ports. Several visits were made to PTP, Kuantan and Kuantan ports. They were responsive to secure cheaper fenders for future projects. The project consultant for PTP, for instance, believed that local manufacturers have the capability to produce good fenders at competitive prices.

The belief that local manufacturers are not able to produce the big-size fenders should be put aside as local manufacturers are now ready to produce big size fenders. They also export their fenders to countries such as Vietnam, Jakarta, Pakistan and Europe. The authorities should play more vital role in supporting the use of local made fenders at our ports.


Testing/Designing

Guide specifications and standards are not widely available, are generally very old and do not cover all the important issues.

The most widely used fender test performance guide is the Japanese Test Standard as published in 24th PIANC Congress, 1977 Annexure 4.1. This standard is now in excess of 20 years old.

Fatigue Testing

Most fenders are subjected to a combination of the following internal factors that effect fatigue live.
  • Metal to rubber interface stresses
  • Rubber compressive stress and strain

  • Rubber shear stress and strain
  • Rubber tension stress and strain.
Most fenders are relatively "understressed" and operate with strain levels in the order of 100% where the ultimate strain level of the rubber is approximately 400%.


Specification for Marine Fenders

MS 1385 : 1995 Marine fenders - Specification for rubber materials

This Malaysian Standard specifies requirements for vulcanized rubber used in marine fenders for ports. General requirements for rubber materials stipulated include the hardness properties, tensile strength and elongation at break, accelerated ageing, compression set, water absorption, ozone resistance, tear strength and abrasion resistance. Other requirements in particular the functional tests shall be the subject of agreement between interested parties.

 
  Other Info
  Processing Flow Chart
   
   
   
   
Site map Contact us Links to Malaysian Rubber Companies Homepage
The Government and Malaysian Rubber Board shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the usage of any information obtained from this site.
© Malaysian Rubber Board 2002. All Rights Reserved.